Jaguar’s Rebrand: A Bold Leap That Forgot to Put the Cat on the Podium
Read at Medium HERE
When Jaguar unveiled its rebrand in 2024, it wasn’t just a facelift—it was a complete identity reinvention. With a futuristic design direction, minimalism turned up to eleven, and a mission to connect with a new breed of eccentrics, Jaguar aimed to leave its classic-luxury reputation in the rearview. The intention was clear: this isn’t your grandfather’s Jaguar anymore.
But while the rebrand was well-crafted and well-timed, its impact stalled in one crucial area—communication.
The Origin: Eccentricity Is in Jaguar’s Blood
Jaguar’s roots are anything but ordinary. Born in 1935 as SS Cars Ltd. and rebranded post-WWII to the far sleeker “Jaguar,” the brand has always lived at the intersection of performance and personality. From the rakish XK120 to the impossibly cool E-Type, early Jaguars weren’t just fast—they were flamboyant, charismatic, and confident. A Jag wasn’t just transportation. It was punctuation.
Throughout the decades, Jaguar became a symbol of classic British luxury, with an air of mischief—elegance with a wink. But as time wore on and competition from German brands grew fierce, Jaguar lost some of its voice, its fire. The rebrand aimed to reignite that.
The Rebrand: For the Eccentrics of Today
The 2024 rebrand was Jaguar’s attempt to speak to a new audience. The eccentrics of today aren’t wearing tweed and quoting Byron—they’re into brutalist architecture, niche design magazines, and silent electric motors with serious torque. Jaguar’s new design language reflects that: minimalist, sculptural, high-end.
It’s beautiful work. Aesthetic-forward, visually distinct, and loaded with intention. The typography is clean, the logo reinterpreted, the vibe high fashion. Jaguar now looks like a tech-luxury brand that could sell you a concept car or a concept sofa. And that’s part of its charm.
So, where did it go wrong?
The Ad That Left Everyone Guessing
The brand’s launch campaign leaned heavily into fashion editorial visuals. Cool people. Rich textures. Cinematic shadows. But noticeably absent? The car.
And this was intentional. Jaguar clearly wanted the campaign to tease, to generate intrigue, to position itself not as “just another car company,” but as a lifestyle. A vibe. A future. As a concept, that was fine—and the initial intrigue worked. It got people talking.
But then... nothing came after.
There was no follow-up that properly introduced the new car. No ad that explained the why behind the rebrand. No clear connection between the legacy of Jaguar and this sleek new direction. For many, the ad felt disconnected—beautiful, yes, but confusing. Without context, it was almost too open-ended.
And here’s the real problem: the copy. Abstract to the point of being vague. Phrases like “Copy nothing” felt hollow—ironically trying too hard to be original. Because let’s be honest: everything is a reference. We’re always drawing inspiration from somewhere. What matters is how you remix it, how you own it, how you build something distinct. “Copy nothing” sounded more like a design school Pinterest board than a rallying cry for one of the most storied marques in automotive history.
What They Got Right
The Design: A total win. The visuals are gorgeous, sophisticated, and forward-thinking. Jaguar now looks like the future of modern luxury.
Target Audience: The shift toward the creative elite, the misfits with money, the new eccentrics? Smart move. That’s the crowd tired of safe luxury.
Courage to Change: Repositioning an icon is never easy. Jaguar had the guts to break free from its own nostalgia. That matters.
What They Got Wrong
The Car Was Missing: The lack of a clear product reveal left people asking: what are we even looking at? A car brand cannot rely entirely on ambiguity. You can tease—but you have to deliver soon after.
No Follow-Through: There was no second act. No campaign clearly linking the brand’s past to this new vision. That’s a missed opportunity. They needed to tell the story before others filled in the blanks.
Weak Copywriting: The copy lacked substance and clarity. A rebrand of this scale needs strong narrative, not vague poetry. The message was too open to interpretation—and not in a good way.
Final Thoughts
Jaguar’s rebrand was a brave and necessary evolution. Visually, it’s stunning. Strategically, it was a smart pivot toward the audience of tomorrow. And design-wise, it’s one of the best executions in the automotive space in years.
But rebrands don’t live in moodboards. They live in stories. And Jaguar didn’t tell theirs.
If the brand had followed up that elegant tease with a bold, intelligent explanation—of the car, of the design, of the mission—people would have had nothing to critique. They’d have clapped.
Instead, Jaguar whispered when it needed to speak clearly. And when you don’t control the narrative, someone else will.
Want to know where your brand stands?
We offer brand audits to identify strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for growth.
Visit www.tomasdelft.com to book a consultation, and let’s craft a brand strategy that positions your business for long-term growth, profitability, and market dominance.
